Ian Welsh

The horizon is not so far as we can see, but as far as we can imagine

You Better Start Swimming, Because Drowning Is Bad For Your Health

~by Sean Paul Kelley

Headwinds: “a headwind blows against the direction of travel of an object . . . decreases the object’s speed and increases the time required to reach its destination.”

Rip Tide: “A rip is a strong, localized, and narrow current of water that moves directly away from the shore, cutting through the lines of breaking waves, like a river flowing out to sea. The force of the current in a rip is strongest and fastest next to the surface of the water. . . Swimmers who are caught in a rip current and who do not understand what is happening, or who may not have the necessary water skills, may panic, or they may exhaust themselves by trying to swim directly against the flow of water.”

Last week I wrote this about our current credit cycle:

The end of this credit cycle is going to include the following macro events: a credit crisis, a housing crisis, an energy shock, with the potential for massive failed deliveries necessary to third world nations creating famine on a biblical scale, at least one Too Big To Fail failing, as Lehman Bros and AIG did in 2008, and the AI bubble bust. All of these will happen. Locked in. Fixed. No way out.

Since then there, as is the way of the world, some things have changed. When facts change, I re-assess ideas and opinions.

First, the Fed, and the ECB, are caught between Scylla and Charybdis (I should not have to explain that reference to this readership, should I?): an imminent credit crisis necessitates monetary easing, whereas a looming energy shock necessitates rate hikes to forestall inflation. Right?

It’s the mother of all dilemmas for a Central Banker.

I think the Fed and ECB as per their dual remits—price stability— will hike rates fearing inflation more (and with some cogent reasons to do so, e.g., the ripple effects of skyrocketing diesel prices) and ignore the massive and imminent credit destruction—the notional value of all global private/shadow credit is about $4 trillion, yes, you read that right—that will force insurers and pensions funds into severe liquidity/solvency crisises that are both overexposed to the private credit shops and locked out of redemptions. That freeze in liquidity will cause morphine-necessary levels of pain on Wall Street, but Main Street won’t even get a Tylenol, granny won’t get her annuity payment and uncle Joe won’t get his county pension, auntie-Mae might even miss her teacher’s pension.

Meanwhile, diesel driven costs will surge through the real economy like a tsunami, destroying purchasing power more forcefully than we have ever seen. We could be looking at a real decline in economic order of 4-7% YoY.

BTW: doesn’t just in time delivery look like an idiot’s fucking fever dream right now?

Bond rates rolled over yesterday. Oil prices remain sticky. Repo fails are surging: $379 billion week as of March 18. Repos, repurchase agreements are the highest quality, safest corporate invetments in existence. Rising repo failures are a clear indicator that, although systemic liquidity exists, confidence is collapsing. Repo failures often have cascading effects on other corporate parties who cannot find the necessary funding for short-term obligations their cash flow is unable to support. Moreover, private credit redemption halts are increasing exponentially. Employment is cratering. Diesel prices are skyrocketing. Housing is in a nationwide free-fall. Systemic liquidity is perilously close to freezing up.

Folks, I hate to say it, but our economy isn’t facing headwinds, it’s facing riptides.

Headwinds are manageable. Riptides kill.

The domestic shocks are enough to call it plain: we’re in a recession. Of course, do not expect accurate or honest economic numbers from Trump’s government. The damage could be limited domestically except for the exogenous shocks resulting from Trump’s Iranian catastrophe.

The global effects are almost incomprehensible.

Consider the damage done to Gulf petrol infrastructure. When refineries get blown-up AVGAS, diesel, helium, urea and fertilizer become impossible to buy. Who cares if it can or cannot make it out of the Straits of Hormuz? If they don’t exist, whatcha going to do? These products are known as petroleum distillates. They are by-products of gasoline refining.

I can’t even begin to comprehend how deleterious and long-term this destruction will be and what kind of follow-on, cascading effects it will have. Consider that helium is essential in making chips. No one, and I mean not a single fucking Wall Street analyst I know of, is factoring in the loss of distillates from destroyed refineries yet. That it bodes very, very ill for the entire world economy is an understatement. It’s not hyperbole to say the economies of the Rules Based Order are in deep peril. Japan and South Korea are in deep kimchi too.

And India’s Green Revolution? Oh man, the carnage might be biblical in scale without access to Persian Gulf fertilizer. It could be like the impact of two failed monsoons. The human exodus? Of all that is holy, it makes me want to curl up in the fetal position.

Not a one of us–including myself–has any true inkling how dependent the modern industrialized and developing world is on petroleum and its by-products. Nor do we have any idea of the catastrophe unfolding in places like South East Asia in regards to food. For example, gas for cooking shortages have lead many people in South East Asia’s mega-cities to abandon the cities for rural home regions where cooking with biomass, primarily animal dung and wood, is practicable. Ponder that for a moment. Then consider the deforestation cascading consequences of those mega-populations reverting to 13th century feeding practices?

If you need it spelled out for you in brutal detail read this utterly demoralizing essay. We are well along the road to ruin.

I’m an historian and confess to a complete lack of a historical framework/reference to analyze and/or opine in any meaningful manner on how epic the shitstorm Trump’s war on Iran will turn out, except I know bone-deep that the Rules Based Order will collapse. The remainder of the world?

Gotterdammerung. Google it if you need explication. I’m too tired, too fucking sick with grief and too enraged to continue.

It’s Time For Iraq To Free Itself And Get Revenge For the Gulf and Iraq Wars

You may remember when Iraq said “Americans must remove all troops from Iraq” and the US said “who cares what you think?”

Well, right now the Iraq resistance is removing all American troops from Iraq. They can’t defend their bases and even had to beg for a truce to remove troops.

But the real problem isn’t American troops in Iraq, it’s financial:

The U.S. control over Iraq’s oil revenues primarily stems from the management of Iraq’s oil income through the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. After the 2003 invasion, the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA), led by the U.S., established the Development Fund for Iraq (DFI), which was held at the New York Fed. The DFI was designed to collect Iraq’s oil revenues and use them for the country’s reconstruction and development. It was also set up to protect the Iraqi oil revenues from lawsuits and claims relating to Saddam Hussein’s rule. Then-president George W. Bush signed an executive order, which has been renewed by every president since, that set up the arrangement. The DFI eventually became an account of the Central Bank of Iraq at the New York Federal Reserve, which remains the case today.
What leverage does this give the U.S. over Iraq?
Oil is Iraq’s most important revenue source, accounting for some 90% of the state budget. This gives Washington significant sway over the country’s economic and political stability. When the Iraqi government asked U.S. troops to leave the country in 2020, Washington reportedly threatened to cut Iraq’s access to the New York Federal Reserve funds, with Baghdad ultimately backing down. While the Iraqi government has gained more control over its financial affairs since the early years of the U.S. occupation, the ongoing relationship highlights the enduring influence of the U.S. on Iraq’s economic landscape, even as the country seeks to assert its sovereignty and independence.

This is the time to end the arrangement. Go to China. Ask them for an account and for a credit equal to the amount now held in American hands. It’s hard to get an accurate figure, but it’s not that large, perhaps a hundred billion or so (that may seem like real money, it isn’t.)

Switch to selling oil in Yuan, the Chinese have a banking system which completely routes around SWIFT. Then just sell their oil to China and other countries who use the system: there’s more than enough demand, especially right now. Iran will let Iraqi oil out, especially under these circumstances. And who needs dollars any more? Anything Iraq needs it can buy from China in Yuan.

Now, Saddam’s revenge.

If you’re old enough you remember the first Gulf War. Iraq invaded Kuwait. Saddam had asked for permission from the US and the response was one Saddam believed was positive. And, after all, Saddam had fought an entire very destructive war against Iran for the US: he was an American proxy. Kuwait was created explicitly over a huge oil reserve as a way of keeping it from Iraq, which it really should be part of: it’s a colonial era legacy state.

Well, the US didn’t approve and the Iraqis got slaughtered, their power, sewage and water infrastructure was systematically destroyed, then Clinton subjected them to savage sanctions which killed million. Estimates of child casualties were over 500,000, based on population studies. Clinton’s secretary of state, Madeline Albright, when asked about this, infamously replied that the deaths were “worth it.”

Anyway, Kuwait’s military is a joke, it’s right next to Iraq and conquering it would be trivial, since there’s no easy way for the US to get troops there. So, switch to China and the Yuan, finish kicking the Americans out, and conquer Kuwait. (No one will cry, Kuwait’s rulers are absolute scum.)

This is a historic opportunity for Iraq, and they should take it.

Everyone reads these article for free, but the site and Ian take money to run. If you value the writing here and can, please subscribe or donate.

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – March 29, 2026

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – March 29, 2026

by Tony Wikrent

Tell Your State To Pass This No-ICE-At-Our-Precincts Model Law. Now.

Josh Marshall, March 27, 2026 [Talking Points Memo]

 I found a piece of model legislation published on March 9th by the Brennan Center.

 

 

War

Plans, Platforms And Projectiles — The longer-term meaning of the Iran war.

Aurelien, Mar 25, 2026

…the lack of a strategy for Iran—as opposed to a generalised aspiration to do harm when the opportunity presented itself—meant that the US was not really prepared for this war, and that the effects on US power and on its economy and its political and military system, will accordingly be a lot more severe than they might otherwise have been….

…For this reason, as for others I’ll touch on, it seems highly unlikely that there will be a “deal,” with Iran, let alone a detailed agreement. If you can’t even decide what you want, it’s hard to persuade someone to give it to you….

[TW: Worth reading to the end and their discussion of the high-tech “platform warfare” the US developed during the cold war, and which all its expensive weapons systems are oriented around, versus the “projectile warfare” which is now emerging in the context of drones and inexpensive precision guidance. It appears that the Iranians decided to orient their military to “projectile warfare” and are damn good at it.]

 

America is Achieving Full-Spectrum Energy Dominance — And Nobody is Paying Attention 

[BettBeat Media, via Naked Capitalism 03-23-2025]

…I have said it many times, and I will say it again: the United States does not lose wars. If it did, it would stop waging them. Whether Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, or Libya — failed states are not failures of Empire. They are the victories of Empire. And Empire is on a roll.

Now the same chorus rises over Iran. Left and right, the refrain is identical: this will be a disaster, America is overreaching, Iran will be its graveyard. The same voices. The same blindness. The same century-old script….

…Medhurst argues that the United States, far from stumbling into another disastrous West Asian quagmire, is executing a calculated seizure of the planet’s energy supply — and that the wars on Syria, Venezuela, Ukraine, and now Iran are not separate blunders but sequential steps toward a single goal: total energy dominance. He coins a term for the endgame: the “petro-gas dollar” or the “LNG dollar.” Let us see if the term deserves to stick….

 

 

Over 11,000 munitions in 16 Days of the Iran War: ‘Command of the Reload’ Governs Endurance 

[Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies]

 

 

Iran’s Ultimatum

Kevin MacDonald, March 22, 2026 [theoccidentalobserver.net]

“We are at war with the Epstein people. The people eating, frying, and raping kids…”

[X-Twitter, via Naked Capitalism 03-25-2025]

Incredible quotes in the deleted Telegraph article about the Lebanese Christians supporting Hezbollah. I wonder why they didn’t want their audience to read this:
“We are at war with the Epstein people. The people eating, frying, and raping kids… the worst part is they are the ones that rule the world.”

 

 

It’s Getting Close to Clear How the War Will Turn Out — Data is available now — there aren’t many paths

Thomas Neuburger, Mar 26, 2026 [God’s Spies]

1. Israelis may well be close to a breaking point

Listen to Lawrence Wilkerson in the following video. The first six minutes is enough, though the rest is fascinating. Wilkerson says, from information he gets privately and from pirated Israeli videos he has seen, that 1) Israel is “flat being devastated” (his emphasis), “literally being ripped apart,” and 2) their casualties could be five to ten times more than what they’ve announced.

2. Israel’s air defense could be close to collapse

Former Pentagon war planner and MIT professor Ted Postol reinforces the point above. In addition, he thinks, now that Israeli air defense radar has been put out of action, Iranian drones, highly accurate, are now unstoppable, as are its armada of super-speed, high-damage missiles like the Fattah and Khorramshahr series.

Because of this, “Iran is now beginning to bring the full weight of its strike capabilities to bear on Israel and the military installations in the Persian Gulf” (9:33 in the video below). He anticipates increased desperation on the part of the Israeli government….

[TW: Most observers who aren’t right wing nutters have said, regarding bombing Iran, that air campaigns have never won a war or even led to a loss of morale by those being bombed. Actually bombing stiffens resistance. I think the same will apply to Israel. In fact, because they faced extermination in the Holocaust, Israelis will probably never lose resolve. That also makes it unlikely they will be willing to accept anything less than defeat and destruction of Iran.]

 

Open Thread

Use to discuss topics unrelated to recent posts. I know you all want to keep talking about gay Klingons, but restrain yourselves!

Getting Real About The Second Iranian War

I saw an article today by the American Conservatives, who tend to be more sensible than most conservatives. It posits that peace can’t be made with Iran till Trump gets tough with Israel, because it’s Israel who keeps escalating.

This is true, but it avoids the pedo-elephant in the room.

It is almost certain that Israel has blackmail on Trump. Videos and pictures of him raping kids or young teenagers. (I print this because I know there is zero chance Trump can risk discovery at a trial.)

Trump is completely compromised. He’s on a leash.

Is this 100%? Of course not. But well over 90%. Trump was Epstein’s best friend for years, and Epstein’s properties were all saturated with video cameras. Epstein clearly worked for Israel.

Trump needs to be impeached or removed with the 25th Amendment, but the problem is that a proportion of Congress are certainly compromised as well, another proportion are bought and paid for, and another proportion are scared of Zionist money being used against them.

So the war seems likely to go on until Israel wants it to stop, and what Trump wants is irrelevant. As for ordinary Americans, their interests are not represented: no one in power gives a damn what they think. The correct action is revolution, but Americans talk big about the 2nd amendment, they don’t use it to resist tyranny.

Iran has some simple needs to be willing to declare peace, the most important of which is “this is the last war”, the second of which is “no more assassinations and no more attacks” and the third of which is “since we can’t trust you to keep any agreement we have to make you incapable of attacking us again or too terrified to do it.”

Manjier has a lot of contacts in the Resistance, here’s the list he published:

Notice that it includes stopping the war/genocide on Libya/Hezbollah and Gaza. There’s no way the Israelis will agree to that unless they have no choice.

I don’t see any way this war ends before Israel is a smoking ruin, and the Gulf States are so terrified of Iran they declare they’ll never allow US bases in their countries again.

Can Iran enforce this? I think so. The US and Israel seem to be running out of interceptors a lot faster than Iran’s running out of missiles and drones. China’s in their corner, quietly supplying them with all the “non military” equipment they need. And Iran’s pain tolerance is extremely high: the decision makers know that if they don’t win decisively again Israel will just assassinate them later and probably kill their families at the same. The new Ayatollah lost his father, wife and kids.

Here’s one analysis of the munitions numbers:

 

The problem, as has been stated many times, is that no “deal” is possible. America will not keep them. Israel will not keep them. So they must be defeated for Iran and its leaders to be safe. The victory must be crushing. If I were in Iran, I would be making the exact same calculation.

We’ll end this with another Iranian propaganda video, sort of a palate cleanser.

Everyone reads these article for free, but the site and Ian take money to run. If you value the writing here and can, please subscribe or donate.

Risk and Reward As Perceived in American Strategic Culture

~by Sean Paul Kelley

How does the way an individual perceives time affect the way they approach risk? And can the way individuals perceive time and risk be applied on a macro scale?

Let’s take a look.

Sociologist Phillip Zimbardo developed a five way typology of how individuals perceive time. People who inhabit certain zones have certain characteristics unique to their typology. Diane Maye, commenting on attitudes toward risk by the US military at The Strategy Bridge writes, “future-oriented people tend to be more successful at achieving their goals, whereas people who frequently reminisce about the past can be overly nostalgic or fearful.” Makes sense, no?

What about those who live in the present? How do they perceive time and more importantly how do they approach risk? This type inhabits what Zimbardo calls the present hedonistic mode, and as Maye elaborates, “[are] more likely to engage in risk-taking behavior.” Maye adds that “the present hedonistic person “lives in and for the moment” and demonstrates a “lack of regard for future consequences.”

I can’t think of anything that describes the outlook of most Americans with more accuracy than this. America is a nation riddled with a present-mind perspective. Our media diet is now totally skewed towards immediate gratification with absolutely zero thought for the future. No one reads long-form essays any longer, much less books. Tik-Tok, X and even the nightly national news is geared towards quippy repartee, not well-informed consideration. Balance and objectivity in reporting just takes too long, especially when you can strike a pose, Right or Left. Such a thing is much easier and much more rewarding to ones endorphin producing centers. Intellectualism is so passé.

Indeed, one of the greatest losses of the last several years was NPRs shift from a medium whose central bias was intellectual, to one that skews left is overtly political. All part and parcel of the slippery slope towards an all pervasive AI-driven society concerned only about its own immediate gratification.

This typology can just as easily be applied to our national approach to such existential matters as voting, domestic economics, and foreign risk, mainly in the context of our conduct of war, best summed up as “bomb first, analyze the loss later.”

The consideration of risk and reward became uncoupled from each other during the Reagan Administration, when the debt markets were restructured drastically by a crucial innovation: MBSs, mortgage-backed securities and junk bonds–supposedly to democratize finance–and the equity markets were deregulated and then a Bull’s ass was set aflame by Greenspan’s long era of easy money. The spread between them only grew worse under Clinton, doubly so under Baby Bush, Obama and aren’t even spoken in the same sentence under our new Maximum Leader, Trump.

Americans, however, are soon going to learn that when you sow the wind, you reap the whirlwind. The consequences of which will be grim.

Starfleet Academy’s Gay Klingon Could’ve Been Epic

~by Sean Paul Kelley

Forewarned: this is culture war stuff. So, if you trigger easily: don’t read this. Then again, you’ll be missing out on some excellent counterintuitive culture war rabble-rousing.

I guess I ought to declare right here and now before I get trounced for being an out of touch GenXer neobigot. So, say it with me, loud and clear: I’m for every human on this planet being treated with the innate dignity they possess and deserve and that they not be denied the rights their ancestors fought so hard for. Rights are not entitlements, they are earned. And much of humanity has, in the past, earned them and passed them down. They should not be denied to anyone.

Now that my virtue signaling is out of the way I can move on to some cultural war criticism.

First, why must a gay man be portrayed as simpering and overly sensitive? Why does this portrayal as queens persist in pretty much all visual media? And FFS, folks, don’t get all sensitive, I’m going somewhere awesome with this.

Why not portray a gay man very much in touch with his masculinity? Need a few historical examples of powerful, masculine gay men that changed the world?

Easy-peasy. First, Alexander the Great and his lover Hephastion. If you disagree, because Iskander has to be a man’s man, well, fuck off. It’s historically inaccurate to believe otherwise. Seriously, the Greeks buggered each other left and right and all were married. Then there is the Prussian King, Frederick the Great, who out maneuvered the armies of Maria “Always Weeping, always Annexing” Theresa of Austria at almost every turn? Both men were as gay as Freddy Mercury, and both were indomitable warriors and strategic geniuses par excellence.

So, when Starfleet Academy wrote in a gay Klingon, I confess, my interest was piqued. The Kurtzman era franchise had a chance to change in a new powerfully positive way. But, the show-runners took the easier, softer way.

For real, they just turned down the wrong alleyway.

See, fiction has rules. You create species or characters and portray them a certain ways; they have to obey their own rules of internal logic. That way the reader or viewer knows what to expect. When a character or species acts contrary to canon, the reader and the viewer are not only confused but lose interest. So, what happened with the gay Klingon?

Let’s discuss Klingons in general first, okay?

Klingons, in case you don’t know, are fierce warriors, poets, singers and deeply, deeply romantic. Klingons are the antithesis of brooding self-actualized pansies, looking for closure or healing. They love killing almost as much as they love dying. “It is a good day to die,” is their constant refrain. And bloodwine? They make the Russians look like pikers when it comes to imbibing alcohol. So, would it not make sense that a gay Klingon ought to have been written in character? To write a gay Klingon any other way than as an awesome bad-ass killing, drinking and fucking machine is to fundamentally misunderstand Klingons and their crucial role in the Star Trek canon.

Let’s take Worf, from TNG and Deep Space 9, as an example. If Worf wanted to fuck another male Klingon, Worf’s idea of foreplay would have been sparring with bat’leths, followed by bending his paramour over a barrel of blood wine, blowing his load, screaming a blood-curdling Klingon scream and then a blood-wine toast, ending with a little spooning and a love poem.

You know I am right.

A gay Klingon could have been immortal. A gay Klingon had the potential to be Star Trek’s equivalent of a honey badger: he don’t give a fuck. A gay Klingon Dahar master? Dip me in a vat of melted cellophane!

Kurtzman and crew had the chance to create an immortal, utterly amazing Klingon in the mold of Alexander the Great or Frederick of Prussia. Instead they opted to tick off the wokester checklist with an absolutely pathetic, weepy, whingy, sniveling crybaby of a Klingon

What a waste.

The Kurtzman iteration of Star Trek has been nothing but failure after failure to understand what Star Trek was. It was never, ever true to Gene Roddenberry’s vision.

The franchise needs a fifteen year rest.

I’ll be ready for a do over in my late sixties. Get it fucking right next time.

What Phase Three of the Credit Cycle Looks Like: the Ponzi Scheme Visualized

~by Sean Paul Kelley

Courtest my alma mater Morgan Stanley, we have this graphic that perfectly depicts what the AI-Ponzi scheme looks like and just how incestuous it truly is:

Is any other comment necessary?

Page 1 of 504

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén